Showing posts with label The Beatles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Beatles. Show all posts

Friday, January 10, 2025

HELP @ 60

Ok, so The Beatles were having a very big second conquest of the world and the idea of the second movie came up. It was contractual like the first one but the plans were off the charts. Colour, massive cast, worldwide locations and a whacky plot that brought them somewhere between James Bond spoofing and pop art. The world was waiting. So, what went wrong?

Well, to start with, it was all of those things listed above and more, but also a far cry from the enhanced documentary that made A Hard Day's Night work across decades. This is before you get to the now unacceptable racial comic stereotypes and highly uneven whimsy that add up to a mess with good songs.

There is a plot. A sacrificial candidate to a Kaliesque Indian cult cannot be executed because she sent the ritual ruby ring to Ringo as a fan gift. This sets the ersatz Thugees on the trail of the Beatle to either retrieve the ring or sacrifice him by a deadline. The Beatles seek assistance from several sources like Indian mystics, jewellers, Scotland Yard and some rogue scientists who discover the ring's potential for weaponry and join the chase. The chase takes them to the Austrian Alps and The Bahamas among other locales and everything kind of romps home to the end credits.

While there are Anglo-Indian cast members, the main roles of the Thugee cult are played by a sub-cast drawn from British talent at the time like Leo McKern, John Bluthal, Eleanor Bron etc. They are in various stages of blackface and affect the kind of accents that even the canonical Goons sported when a quick laugh was needed. There's really no pedalling back from this, although there is a meta commentary in the Indian restaurant scene where all the staff are played by Cockney's who mention union regulations. 

That reminded me of something much later, the Yiddish speaking Native Americans of Blazing Saddles and, later still, the tribal characters in Cannibal The Musical who are played by Koreans who protest their Native American authenticity. Both of these examples stand spotless in the frequently dodgy comedy of both those film makers. The restaurant staff almost redeem things but once that scene has played we're back to the goodness-gracious-me bad guys. The only reason they are Indian at all is because of the deadly cult of the scary Asian climes. I've just imagined the cult as West Country Druids and it's immediately funnier. This is spilt milk, of course. I would oppose revisionism to wield an AI brush to this one. If you sit in front of it you are going to get some tidbits from the playbook of The British Raj by way of end-of- pier comedians and panto.

A cleverer counterpoint to this is the scientist constantly complaining about the build quality of British supervillain weapons. His use of and disgust for the various lasers and mismatches of international power connections plays like a smart parody of Bond movies' catalogues of spy weapons and would have sat comfortably in an episode of the spy-fi show The Avengers and certainly found regular appearances in the soon to appear Get Smart. Could The Fabs have squared off against the boffins as main baddies with music technology forces like guitar feedback? They'd already done I Feel Fine, by then. Ok, that is the kind of embarrassingly goofy thing that a groovy minded senior of the time might have thought up, but it's the end of my holidays and I'm overheating.

And where are The Beatles themselves in all this? On the sidelines with dialogue wisecracks more zany than funny, action-mannequins in their own movie. It's important to remember that initial screenings of this film were to the demographic who screamed like Boeing jets every time one of the guys had a close up. Almost all the humour is aimed at that bullseye and, where it had been percussive and genuinely funny in the first film, doesn't really have to do much in this one as the comedy focus is aimed away from the stars and on to the cast of clowny others.

What you do get, though, is the songs of the first side of the album of the same name which have them at the peak before Rubber Soul pushed them irrevocably into the critical stratosphere. All of them play like contemporary music videos (the title track actually is an old timey performance clip). All the song writers, teamed or individual, are approaching heights of craft.

As you watch these performances and witness the sidelining of the stars it might well occur to you that you are looking at celebrities in a bubble. They are both too well known and approaching unknowable at this stage. The gigs keep getting bigger and the hits keep coming. The interviews get more guarded and the blackened windows of their limos are wound all the way up. They can't make another Hard Day's Night, it, oddly, would now appear too contrived, too fake. This precursor to the Batman and Monkees TV shows is about as candid as they can allow themselves. The members of the band were a lot less enthused about this film than the first one. They'd grown creatively restless and the I-love-she-loves-we-love assembly line had already frayed beyond repair. They'd seen the mightiest adoration that any small collective of their species could and the only thing new to them was lurking in the shadows. And they'd adopted slower drugs, getting through each pincushion day in a haze of cannabis coughs. 

I wonder what a third film might have been like in this series, a movie after the adventurous and darker corners of the Revolver album were known to their fans and the general public. A psychedelic pioneer? Ninety minutes of solipsistic twaddle? The closest we get is Lennon's role in Richard Lester's How I Won the War, colourful, absurdist and edgy but destined for the bargain bin. The year after that, when the bubble developed a leak with Magical Mystery Tour, the effort to embrace the weirder times was eclipsed by the more genuinely psychedelic Yellow Submarine cartoon, the year after that. Maybe that's as futile as the single disc White Album that fans persist with, beyond the point where it is either healthy or useful. But that this was the second and last statement of Beatles movie as PR exercise, we were left with what feels like a second episode you watch just to get to the third. Then again, we are talking about a music group.

Help is a film best watched lightly. It doesn't have the quaint pretensions of John Boorman's Catch Us if You Can but is unhampered by the cuteness (however more engaging) Herman's Hermits vehicle Mrs Brown You've Got a Lovely Daughter. The Rolling Stones were not a fit for loveable fiction features, being far better suited to documentaries (and what documentaries). The Kinks might have done something intriguing, if they'd been asked. And Cliff was a distant recollection, destined to follow the St. Trinians movie after Christmas lunch. 

But that's the thing. Movies built around musical acts have never quite convinced Hard Day's Night does because it was a one off, a fictional documentary made with funny people. The recent The Nowhere Inn with St Vincent playing herself is cushioned with fictive invention and acquits itself as an oddity. More celebrated are the legend makers that blithely pursue the real with gleeful fabrication like Almost Famous. And there are too many like Eddie and the Cruisers or The Doors which lie as embarrassing stains in the carpet that resist cleaning. Help is of its time, offering a high def colour record of how a PR engine overheated, never to start again.

Friday, August 2, 2019

Review: YESTERDAY

You've seen the trailer or the poster. What it says on the tin is that after a worldwide glitch no one remembers The Beatles except for one struggling singer/songwriter. This fable about the importance of telling the truth makes no attempt to explain why what looks like a worldwide power outage could remove vinyl LPs from a record collection but what it does try is to convince us that The Beatles left the world a better place. So, if no one remembers the songs that improved life on earth why does it look the same as if they did? I'm beginning with what look like closing remarks because this is a film that begs a lot of indulgence from its viewers. It does say that on the tin as well but can it sustain a running time that pushes the two hour mark: will love be all you need?

Well, this is a Richard Curtis screenplay so if you liked the Four Weddings, Love Actually etc. juggernauts then you'll demand a kind of measured light and dark comedy in the dialogue and scheme. Danny Boyle as director is going to provide plenty of extra visual goodies to keep you amused if the romantic subplot doesn't quite work. But, really, what carries this kind of film more than anything else is the casting and that, at the very least, comes right through. Himesh Patel is a kind of rabbit-in-the-headlights Russell Brand (which means he's more likeable than the real thing) as Jack and he is countered by the energetic and rangy Lily James as Ellie and the pair do compel when they share the screen. My favourite choice, though, is the always welcome sass and sharps of Katie McKinnon whose megamouthed moneygrubbing cynicism feels fresh and (mostly) short of caricature. All the stock, aren't-we-lovely Brits characters do everything they need and even the real pop star as himself Ed Sheeran doesn't embarrass.

OK, so it looks good, flows with light laughs and a feelgood message, does the elephant get a feed? If you presented Beatles hit songs to a public that had never heard them, would they still be hits? There is evident work put into fitting these songs into a more contemporary presentation that allows something like Help as an electric rocker or I Want to Hold Your Hand as a perky acoustic number sound genuinely fresh. But there's also a kind of fall back approach that has most of the songs sounding like Beatles night on Idol or X-Factor. If you've ever seen one of those where twenty-nothing contestants unfamiliar with the back catalogue try filtering them through contemporary stock vocal gymnastics it can be as wincing as a YouTube of Star Spangled Banner fails at football games. The problem is that if you are to carry a concept like this through you really have to include that approach as one of the few graspable handles of veracity. As superbly crafted as the best Beatles melodies are some can easily get smothered. And what are we to make of the song-off scene where Sheeran's fine sounding acoustic pop number is trounced by a schmaltzy Beatles standard? Does the reverence here lie in the notion of great songcraft or great songcrafters?

I don't think that's overthinking things in a film whose what-if concept is dependent upon its audiences sharing its assumption that The Beatles are so unassailable. I'm a massive Beatles fan but a second generation one. I found my way back to the '60s from what I felt was a largely barren '70s. While my ardour was temporarily dampened by punk it returned and is in rude health as I type. It makes me wonder that if the chief targets of this fable are the same millennials as its lead characters, is it only a bold attempt to lure them into the values of their grandparents without the context of the generational conflict that fed the transformative culture of the '60s? Is it a way to push through the infinity of streaming in pursuit of quality or unsubstantiated reverence?

I enjoyed Yesterday (yes, I know there is a clue to my last question in that title alone) but hesitate to recommended it without reservation. In being less about The Beatles than an idea of them how deeply felt can the message of truthfulness really go?