See, the credit sequence (set to the tune of a faux folk ballad by Lalo Schifrin and sung byThe Osmonds - yes, really) promised a cute and warming coming of age as young Ponce (I laugh every time I type that) clearly needs a shot of Man-Up so he can vault over the heartbreak and learn love. The scene in the gents' plays like the kind of black comedy that Robert Altman or Elaine May were making their own. The bizarre love-generation romping between staff and students (it's not just Tiger) are a tiny flick away from cringe sex-comedies from the mid sixties. The murder trail of female students gets longer and is not played for laughs. One of the first names you see in the credits is Gene Roddenberry. The creator of Star Trek who took American TV to where no TV had gone before with fables on the evils of warfare, arms races, colonisation and the first American onscreen interracial kiss, also wrote this. The last name you see in the credits is director Roger Vadim.
Now, Vadim is no slouch as a filmmaker but if you make one Nutty Naughty Chateau that's how you get pegged. If you keep making them it won't matter how many earnest pieces you can boast it will be the T&A that will get you hired. So it was that Roddenberry's dark social satire grew leggy and raunchy under the watch of the same guy who made sci-fi sniggeringly naughty in Barbarella (a film I sometimes love and sometimes cringe at). It's 1971 and New Hollywood is soon to rise and tear itself from l'ancien regime irrevocably but, as we'll see in this blog series, until that happened we had a mainstream that was growing increasingly curious and playful.
Vadim's importation for the director role and his clear hand is smearing his prints over every scene. The thing is that none of it plays well as comedy. The timing is all off and the performances aren't allowing it (they're good just not comic). Rock Hudson's Tiger (also the school's football coach) is straight out of a vintage "What kind of man reads Playboy?" marketing ad. Not even the dependable Hudsonian charm can lift him out of looking like hippy never happened. Vadim's self conscious sex-first zeitgeist is like May '68 never happened. That scared the likes of Godard away from narrative altogether as he dived into the underground (kind of). But Rog? Hey, maybe I can bring a better class of sex to America. And I don't need to change my M.O. Hell they're paying me for it. (You know, even Benny Hill toned it down for his brief comeback in the '80s.)
If, however, you are patient there is a reward to all this and it feels like the writer's intention was too strong to dismiss. The final sequence is an inversion of the opening and carries a suggestion, cold and mechanical, of how the social order is maintained. It is expertly judged and chilling. I guess there were a lot of pretty maids before we got to the row.
No comments:
Post a Comment