Showing posts with label Antiviral. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Antiviral. Show all posts

Saturday, April 25, 2020

SHADOWS Contactless: 8.30pm Friday May 1: ANTIVIRAL (SBS on Demand)

Syd is embezzling from his employer. So what? Normal enough crime drama stuff. Well, it's what he's stealing. He works at Lucas Clinic, a company that sells the illnesses of the rich and famous to the poor and aspirant. And he sneaks samples past the industrial security to sell for himself. The death of the star he took it from dies and Syd becomes a target.



This is not a horror film. If it were paced more tightly it might be a thriller but its interest does not lie there either. With superfans not only buying copyrighted viruses with installed digital rights management, there is a grey market in meat grown from the stars' DNA we are in the realm of heavy satire. And we must recall or be informed that satire isn't always funny.

There is elephant DNA in this film. It was written and directed by the son of someone whose surname has become an adjective in cinema history. You might think Brandon Cronenberg, if he chose to become a filmmaker at all (rather than a sand sculptor or a bud driver) would elect to prove himself an individual by not making such a ... Cronenbergian piece. Why not a sprightly rom com or a fashionable live musical? Because he had an idea and pursued it. If you look at it beyond the synopsis you will see the work of a young writer/director toiling seriously to bring his story to the screen. Besides, times being themselves, we might be in dire need of another Cronenberg walking amongst us.

Then again, cheap shoot as you will, this film does work. It feels like there's a new wow concept every five minutes in the first act and, though the second settles a little too comfortably into development and the intrigue sets in, there is a real punch waiting in the final act, served up with an image that will stay with you. This is a debut film from a young filmmaker with big shoes to fill who would not be lightly forgiven for the slightest flub. Damn me if he doesn't get away with it.

This is the first diversion from the Netflix Party format as it is available through SBS on Demand. This will take discipline and coordination. We'll use Messenger for comments. I'll leave a guide in a post on the Facebook page.

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Review: ANTIVIRAL

So why did the only person who could never get away with his thematic choice being automatically questioned by virtue of the circumstances of his birth choose this film to make as a debut?

Sid works as a lifestyle consultant at a firm that supplies people with the diseases of their idols. His spiel to the customer is creepy for both its insidiousness and the rote-learned delivery Sid tries to conceal with a sensuous purr. As he leaves work each day he is frisked and asked to declare that he isn't carrying (dig the double entendre) any property of the company. At home he inserts a smuggled sample into a machine that looks like a clanking prototype and proceeds to remove the copyright from the virus he's just injected. He's going to sell it on the black market whose outlet is a butcher's shop that sells steaks derived from the cells of celebrities.

Got all that? There's more. The first half hour of this film hits you with a new wow concept every few minutes. How does one celebrity get an unscheduled disease? She went to China and caught a knock off. And on. This is the work of someone who has paused after a brainwave notion and thought about the world it describes. When this approach goes flat it grates like overthought comedy but here everything we encounter about this society seems to fit as though it was in the room when we got there.

Just as natural is the choice of casting. Caleb Landry Jones wears his suits like a coat hanger. When you first see him you wonder if there's anything under the fabric except a wire frame. He skulks and shifts as though the light of the interiors, though artificial, will only increase the population of ginger freckles on his small, intense face. He's like a very young Brad Dourif without the brutality. As such he moves through his character's phases with the adaptiveness of a camouflaging insect, convincing us variously of his health, ill health, intellect and survivalism without showing any of his working.

That's good because this is a film that threatens to collapse under the weight of its ideas in a second act weakened by inertia and repetition. This is the aspect that doesn't look well schooled or confident. So much time is spent drawing out the consequences of his fateful action at the end of the first act and at the same time blending his (intentionally) awkward relationship with a particular celebrity that by the time we get to the inevitable twists and turns they feel like they're being read out of the screenplay seminar handbook.

But then the third act finds its feet and delivers the promises of the first up to the final breathtaking image of consummation.

I should point out that even though I saw this film much earlier this year I was unable to review it as the preview screening I went to at the Nova stalled when the projection or the DCP caught a virus (yes, everyone in the audience was cracking that one) and I and my friend decided to leave after a seemingly interminable ten or so minutes. Until I caught up with it recently and got to the ending it had left an unbreathing sense of disappointment in me which no amount of guessing could placate.

But the finale is as strong and awe-inspiring as anything out of the director's Dad's mind. This film that would have been called Cronenbergian if the director's name was Smith offers no slight to the family tradition. Even the dumpy middle act is no mark against when you consider how the effects and ideas took precedence over the performances in Cronenberg senior's early pieces.

So why did Brandon Cronenberg, the only person who could never get away with his thematic choice being automatically questioned by virtue of the circumstances of his birth choose to make a body horror first off? I Googled interviews with him and he emerges well. The idea of celebrity culture plus a digitised biology got his mind soaring. He didn't do a musical or a buddy movie because this one got in the way of everything else.

Also, he doesn't have to be David Cronenberg's son to want to make a Cronenberg film. Cronenberg Snr put such a bug into film culture with his early work that no sci-fi that isn't just high (i.e. single) concept popcorn what-if can quite escape the duty to add that, yes, viral strain of satire to be fulfilling. There are so many but straight up Todd Haynes's deep and troubling Safe comes to mind. More recently the films of Zal Batmanglij and Britt Marling (Sound of My Voice or The East) have had no trouble taking aim at the hive-mindedness, venality or political sleaze their authors see around them and coating it all in the alien sheen of a Videodrome or a Crash. The time is never the future. The time is always now.